Romer Prize Session:
For those of you who are not as familiar with SVP "the Alfred Sherwood Romer Prize recognizes an outstanding scientific contribution in vertebrate paleontology by a predoctoral student." The Romer Prize Session is a series of talks held during the meeting in which one speaker is then chosen as the winner of the Aldred Sherwood Romer Prize and the winner is announced at the awards ceremony on the last night of the meeting. Below, I list the talks from the session that were pertinent to the clade Crurotarsi, as well as any notes I had on the talk.
- "Tooth pressure, niche occupation and the evolution of the cranial ecomorphology of crocodylians." by P. Gignac.
- discussed how body size is mostly able to explain bite force and that tooth pressure in crocodylians often exceeds the shear stress limit of bone
- produced a model that was able to predict individual bite force, giving insight into individual variation
- "Seasonality as a potential source of variation in Alligator cranial evolution." by R. Sadleir
- This was an excellent talk (partially because epigenetics were discussed) focusing on phenotypic plasticity as affected by seasonality (and aseasonality)
- studied ranch animals and wild animals from the same breeding population (also was very good at taking into account many other variable that may have also been sources of phenotypic plasticity)
- showed how seasonal vs aseasonal environments induced large amounts of phenotypic plasticity that may explain some instances of speciation within Alligator
- "Evolution of salt-water tolerance in the Crocodylia and related crocodylomorphs: new insights from stable isotopes." by P. Wheatley
- distribution and phylogeny suggests salt-water tolerance as an ancestral trait in crocodylomorphs, evolving at least as far back as Dyrosauridae + Crocodylia and becoming secondarily lost in alligators and gharials
- since it is quite reasonable to assume that thalattosuchians were salt-water tolerant, they can be used as a geochemical proxy for salt-water tolerance in fossils (using carbon isotopes to show access to marine food sources and oxygen isotopes to show marine vs. freshwater "drinking")
- Evidence suggests that dyrosaurids were salt-water tolerant and possibly even pelagic. If they were indeed pelagic, why did dyrosaurids survive the K-T extinction when so many other large taxa living in the same environment went extinct? Perhaps the juveniles were living in a freshwater environment (in fact, an audience member confirmed the presence of juvenile dyrosaurids in freshwater sedimentary environments).
Monday afternoon also yielded a few more talks on Crurotarsans, including one on a phytosaur, Pseudopalatus (although it was a somewhat poor talk), and a fantastic talk on the phylogenetic position of Thalattosuchia.
- "Fossil crocodyliforms and turtles from the Early Cretaceous of Northeastern Mali" by Hill et al
- "The endocranium, inner ear, and pneumatic structure of the Upper Triassic phytosaur Pseudopalatus pristinus" by Smith et al
- "Thy phylogenetic position of Thalattosuchia (Crocodylomorpha) and the importance of outgroup choice" by Eric Wilberg
- "Opportunism, acoustics and mass: exaptation and patterns of middle-ear expansion in Archosauria" by Dave Dufeau and Larry Witmer
"Thy phylogenetic position of Thalattosuchia (Crocodylomorpha) and the importance of outgroup choice" sounds very interesting...
ReplyDeleteWill it be published somewhere?
Wilberg is working on it as part of his PhD, so I'm sure he will have a lot to publish on this. His talk focused on the importance of outgroup choice. When he used a rauisuchian like Postosuchus instead of Protosuchus for the outgroup, Thalattosuchia falls out of Crocodyloformes.
ReplyDeletefyi, susan, don't leak information on blogs PLEASE. you are violating the embargo. I know it's tempting but please don't... you're putting someone else's future ability to market a paper at risk.
ReplyDelete"including one on a phytosaur, Pseudopalatus (although it was a somewhat poor talk)"
this one was OH SHIT bad. I was in the audience thinking damn, i could look at this guy's slides in 5 minutes and give the talk a thousand times better. glad someone else has the balls to at least mention it. but you sure did sugar coat it. it was easily the worst talk i saw at the entire meeting.
Actually, as a blogger, I received a press kit and was fully informed of the embargo policy. Because I did not post until after the talk was given, I am in full compliance with the SVP embargo policy. I take the embargo policy very seriously. As far as the embargo policies of other publications, I kept my notes to an extent that they were discussed in the abstract book or remained vague in my description. IF there is indeed a violation of another institution's embargo policy, or an author requests anything to be removed, I would be happy to do it ASAP. Thanks!
ReplyDelete